![programmier for 08 lmm programmier for 08 lmm](https://i3.ytimg.com/vi/3oMh3fVwpV4/hqdefault.jpg)
#Programmier for 08 lmm code
The bug happens in four different pieces of the complex CFL code I am currently working, but I have been able to reproduce it on a smaller code (main.f90 attached). If it is not, I would be really thankful if someone could point me to the error in my code. I am experiencing some strange behavior when I use the OMP SIMD directive in a couple of loops with inlined subroutines and I am getting more and more convinced that this might be a bug in the compiler. SUBROUTINE type2_write_form (me, unit, iotype, v_list, iostat, Writes the dataset information from the. SUBROUTINE type2_read_form (me, unit, iotype, v_list, iostat, Writes the dataset information from the. PROCEDURE, PRIVATE :: write_form => type2_write_form PROCEDURE, PRIVATE :: read_form => type2_read_form SUBROUTINE abs_write_form (me, unit, iotype, v_list, iostat, Writes the dataset information from the. INTEGER, DIMENSION(:), INTENT(IN) :: v_list SUBROUTINE abs_read_form (me, unit, iotype, v_list, iostat, Writes the dataset information from the. GENERIC, PUBLIC :: WRITE (FORMATTED) => write_form GENERIC, PUBLIC :: READ (FORMATTED) => read_form PROCEDURE(abs_write_form), DEFERRED, PRIVATE :: write_form PROCEDURE(abs_read_form), DEFERRED, PRIVATE :: read_form Is it not possible to write an abstract derived type I/O read and write procedure and then over-write it with an extension of the type? I'm running into error #8638: the type/rank signature for arguments of this specific subroutine is identical to another specific subroutine that shares the same defined I/O.